There are plenty of popular things that I’m not into, but I can at least see why they might appeal to someone else. Graphic novels. The Kindle. Sports. But when it comes to the rabid popularity of “Twilight,” I’m honestly at a loss. After years of wondering what all the hype was about, I bit the bullet and watched the first “Twilight” movie when it showed up on Showtime. And it was quite honestly one of the worst things I’ve ever seen (and I’ve seen a LOT of crap). So can anyone explain its appeal to me?
Bella is a horrible role model. I shudder to think of the number of teenage girls who want to model themselves after swoony, breathless Bella. She has zero personality, no apparent hobbies or passions of her own, and is completely willing to sacrifice herself for the first guy she falls for … at the ripe old age of 17. That girl needs to get her own life, get the heck out of Forks and discover what the world has to offer.
It is not a “chaste” love story. Apparently, one of the primary reasons parents are so willing to let their preteens, tweens and teens get swept up in the “Twilight” madness is because there is no sex going on in the stories. Heck, vampires can’t even kiss a human without major complications. But the movie is still chock full of tortured longing, sexual tension, heavy panting, overly emotional declarations, and all the other crap that teens go through. And it’s perfectly clear that if Bella and Edward were able to bone without problems, they totally would. So if parents are using “Twilight” as a way to teach their kids about waiting to have sex, they’d be better off, you know, actually talking to their kids about sex.
These guys are not sexy. I may be a bit biased since I was young during the last vampire craze, way back in the yesteryears of the 1990s when Anne Rice novels were hugely popular, and everyone saw “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” and “Interview with the Vampire.” Those vampires were sexy AND dangerous, which just helped to add to their sexiness. The “Twilight” vampires are whiny, emo and … sparkly? And don’t even get me started on how creepy it is that there are “Twilight moms” who lust after them. If a middle-aged guy was drooling over a teenage girl, he’d be labeled a pervert and a pedophile, but if a middle-aged woman has her knickers in a knot over a teenage boy, everyone’s OK with it? That’s taking a double standard to an insanely creepy new level.
These are just my main issues with “Twilight,” as I don’t have the energy or the interest to get into the horrible acting, major plot holes and plodding pacing. Are the novels much better than the movie? I know I’ve been disappointed with the “Harry Potter” movies after loving the books, so is this a similar issue of the movie not living up to its source material? Or is it simply a case of someone, somewhere decided “Twilight” was the new “it” thing, and everyone else just drank the Kool-Aid? Because on artistic merit alone, I can’t even justify it as a guilty pleasure, as guilty pleasures are supposed to have something pleasurable about them.
. . .
Follow Rachel Coyne on Twitter at http://twitter.com/TheOpinionatedB.
haha, love this! I do not get how people over the age of 18 get into Twilight. (sorry friends that will read this that also like twilight!)
Amen. I couldn’t agree more with everything in this article. I don’t get the whole “Twilight” thing either. Watching that movie was something akin to a root canal for me.
Twilight is absolute TRASH!! It is a huge rip-off of Smallville and it is Filmed with a VHF camera from the 80s. While I watched the first one, I just wanted Simon Cowell to come out of nowhere and say: “This is absolute RUBBISH!!” It is offensive to real Vwmpire movies and books! So, if they go in the sunlight they shine like diamonds??? What, was this story written by Paris Hilton? If you havent seen it, your IQ is automatically boosted at least by 50 points!! lol
Friggin couldn’t agree more, if you wanna see some vampires check out “Interview with a Vampire”, Lestat was bad ass even for Tom Cruise! He didn’t sparkle, WTF!!! Is that suppose to scare me. Don’t get me started on Bella, if she wasn’t whiny enough in the book they Kristen Stewart to portray her, she couln’t act her way out of a paper bag. Yes i read the first book but only because i was without tv for a week< next time I will just re read Harry Potter again
Totally agree with you Rachel it’s pure, unadulterated crap but young, impressionable girls and their equally impressionable moms still seem to lap it up. I got through the first book, read out of curiosity because girls in my class were enthralled with it. Couldn’t finish the second one and skipped the third and fourth ones. Went straight to the sex scene in the fourth one, again out of curiosity and on advice from my niece, and wasn’t impressed. Turgid at best. Really bad writing, if anything the movie was “better” at least it didn’t last as long.